What Year Was David a Popular Baby Name
Popularity in the U.s.a.
Other Regions
Numbers
| David (masculine) | David (feminine) | |||||
| Year | Rank | Percent Used | Rank | Percentage Used | ||
| 2020 | #28 | 0.445 | - | - | ||
| 2019 | #27 | 0.468 | - | - | ||
| 2018 | #22 | 0.504 | - | - | ||
| 2017 | #22 | 0.517 | - | - | ||
| 2016 | #19 | 0.550 | - | - | ||
| 2015 | #18 | 0.579 | - | - | ||
| 2014 | #xviii | 0.597 | - | - | ||
| 2013 | #17 | 0.613 | - | - | ||
| 2012 | #twenty | 0.619 | - | - | ||
| 2011 | #18 | 0.652 | - | - | ||
| 2010 | #fifteen | 0.692 | - | - | ||
| 2009 | #fourteen | 0.729 | - | - | ||
| 2008 | #xiv | 0.749 | - | - | ||
| 2007 | #12 | 0.793 | - | - | ||
| 2006 | #thirteen | 0.805 | - | - | ||
| 2005 | #xiii | 0.852 | - | - | ||
| 2004 | #fourteen | 0.871 | - | - | ||
| 2003 | #14 | 0.887 | - | - | ||
| 2002 | #xiii | 0.904 | - | - | ||
| 2001 | #12 | 0.936 | - | - | ||
| 2000 | #16 | 0.947 | - | - | ||
| 1999 | #16 | 0.998 | - | - | ||
| 1998 | #13 | i.030 | - | - | ||
| 1997 | #14 | 1.096 | - | - | ||
| 1996 | #xiii | 1.149 | - | - | ||
| 1995 | #xvi | 1.145 | - | - | ||
| 1994 | #13 | 1.220 | - | - | ||
| 1993 | #11 | one.309 | - | - | ||
| 1992 | #x | 1.354 | - | - | ||
| 1991 | #eight | 1.435 | - | - | ||
| 1990 | #six | 1.569 | - | - | ||
| 1989 | #v | 1.681 | - | - | ||
| 1988 | #6 | i.764 | #751 | 0.013 | ||
| 1987 | #five | 1.887 | #717 | 0.013 | ||
| 1986 | #5 | 1.934 | #668 | 0.015 | ||
| 1985 | #6 | ii.002 | #641 | 0.016 | ||
| 1984 | #v | 2.051 | #705 | 0.013 | ||
| 1983 | #4 | 2.104 | #567 | 0.018 | ||
| 1982 | #5 | ii.144 | #702 | 0.014 | ||
| 1981 | #5 | ii.183 | #735 | 0.013 | ||
| 1980 | #4 | 2.260 | #626 | 0.016 | ||
| 1979 | #iv | ii.348 | #618 | 0.017 | ||
| 1978 | #4 | two.382 | #655 | 0.015 | ||
| 1977 | #four | 2.371 | #647 | 0.015 | ||
| 1976 | #4 | 2.406 | #669 | 0.015 | ||
| 1975 | #5 | 2.414 | #645 | 0.015 | ||
| 1974 | #4 | 2.564 | #649 | 0.015 | ||
| 1973 | #5 | two.546 | #660 | 0.014 | ||
| 1972 | #4 | 2.768 | #643 | 0.015 | ||
| 1971 | #3 | ii.922 | #636 | 0.015 | ||
| 1970 | #two | 3.241 | #604 | 0.016 | ||
| 1969 | #2 | 3.481 | #571 | 0.017 | ||
| 1968 | #ii | 3.587 | #589 | 0.016 | ||
| 1967 | #2 | 3.755 | #560 | 0.016 | ||
| 1966 | #2 | 3.654 | #629 | 0.013 | ||
| 1965 | #three | three.580 | #667 | 0.012 | ||
| 1964 | #3 | three.702 | #647 | 0.013 | ||
| 1963 | #iii | iii.800 | #657 | 0.012 | ||
| 1962 | #2 | 3.869 | #577 | 0.014 | ||
| 1961 | #2 | 3.931 | #677 | 0.011 | ||
| 1960 | #1 | iii.968 | #680 | 0.011 | ||
| 1959 | #ii | 3.874 | #650 | 0.011 | ||
| 1958 | #ii | 3.836 | #693 | 0.010 | ||
| 1957 | #3 | 3.764 | #780 | 0.008 | ||
| 1956 | #4 | 3.804 | #786 | 0.008 | ||
| 1955 | #2 | iv.131 | #788 | 0.007 | ||
| 1954 | #5 | three.845 | #748 | 0.008 | ||
| 1953 | #5 | 3.802 | #747 | 0.008 | ||
| 1952 | #v | iii.636 | #777 | 0.007 | ||
| 1951 | #5 | 3.389 | #902 | 0.006 | ||
| 1950 | #5 | 3.339 | #742 | 0.008 | ||
| 1949 | #six | 3.308 | #807 | 0.007 | ||
| 1948 | #5 | three.176 | #782 | 0.007 | ||
| 1947 | #six | three.112 | #833 | 0.006 | ||
| 1946 | #vi | ii.814 | #806 | 0.007 | ||
| 1945 | #6 | ii.706 | #811 | 0.006 | ||
| 1944 | #6 | 2.691 | #762 | 0.007 | ||
| 1943 | #half-dozen | 2.560 | #736 | 0.008 | ||
| 1942 | #6 | 2.549 | #697 | 0.008 | ||
| 1941 | #seven | two.435 | #727 | 0.008 | ||
| 1940 | #7 | ii.334 | #762 | 0.007 | ||
| 1939 | #7 | 2.238 | #705 | 0.008 | ||
| 1938 | #8 | 2.023 | #889 | 0.006 | ||
| 1937 | #eight | 1.918 | #819 | 0.006 | ||
| 1936 | #10 | 1.642 | #951 | 0.005 | ||
| 1935 | #11 | ane.464 | #892 | 0.006 | ||
| 1934 | #12 | 1.318 | #774 | 0.007 | ||
| 1933 | #thirteen | 1.179 | #834 | 0.006 | ||
| 1932 | #12 | i.130 | #941 | 0.005 | ||
| 1931 | #13 | one.101 | #926 | 0.005 | ||
| 1930 | #15 | i.087 | #755 | 0.007 | ||
| 1929 | #17 | 1.020 | #828 | 0.006 | ||
| 1928 | #19 | 0.876 | #888 | 0.006 | ||
| 1927 | #21 | 0.811 | #982 | 0.005 | ||
| 1926 | #22 | 0.789 | #997 | 0.005 | ||
| 1925 | #22 | 0.774 | - | - | ||
| 1924 | #24 | 0.749 | - | - | ||
| 1923 | #24 | 0.727 | - | - | ||
| 1922 | #24 | 0.699 | - | - | ||
| 1921 | #25 | 0.682 | - | - | ||
| 1920 | #25 | 0.676 | - | - | ||
| 1919 | #27 | 0.662 | - | - | ||
| 1918 | #28 | 0.632 | - | - | ||
| 1917 | #28 | 0.636 | - | - | ||
| 1916 | #28 | 0.630 | - | - | ||
| 1915 | #31 | 0.612 | - | - | ||
| 1914 | #29 | 0.622 | - | - | ||
| 1913 | #29 | 0.612 | - | - | ||
| 1912 | #29 | 0.633 | - | - | ||
| 1911 | #27 | 0.645 | - | - | ||
| 1910 | #30 | 0.603 | - | - | ||
| 1909 | #29 | 0.619 | - | - | ||
| 1908 | #thirty | 0.611 | - | - | ||
| 1907 | #31 | 0.596 | - | - | ||
| 1906 | #31 | 0.609 | - | - | ||
| 1905 | #32 | 0.585 | - | - | ||
| 1904 | #31 | 0.590 | - | - | ||
| 1903 | #33 | 0.554 | - | - | ||
| 1902 | #30 | 0.573 | - | - | ||
| 1901 | #thirty | 0.581 | - | - | ||
| 1900 | #32 | 0.545 | - | - | ||
| 1899 | #32 | 0.561 | - | - | ||
| 1898 | #30 | 0.617 | - | - | ||
| 1897 | #29 | 0.599 | - | - | ||
| 1896 | #28 | 0.593 | - | - | ||
| 1895 | #32 | 0.558 | - | - | ||
| 1894 | #29 | 0.584 | - | - | ||
| 1893 | #27 | 0.598 | - | - | ||
| 1892 | #24 | 0.618 | - | - | ||
| 1891 | #26 | 0.616 | - | - | ||
| 1890 | #26 | 0.611 | - | - | ||
| 1889 | #22 | 0.636 | - | - | ||
| 1888 | #21 | 0.617 | - | - | ||
| 1887 | #22 | 0.616 | #788 | 0.006 | ||
| 1886 | #24 | 0.566 | - | - | ||
| 1885 | #22 | 0.614 | - | - | ||
| 1884 | #21 | 0.620 | - | - | ||
| 1883 | #xx | 0.653 | #817 | 0.005 | ||
| 1882 | #19 | 0.687 | - | - | ||
| 1881 | #18 | 0.693 | - | - | ||
| 1880 | #eighteen | 0.734 | #943 | 0.004 | ||
 | | |||||
What Year Was David a Popular Baby Name
Source: https://www.behindthename.com/name/david/top
0 Response to "What Year Was David a Popular Baby Name"
Post a Comment